Mastery Learning in High School Chemistry

I saw this over at ScienceGeekGirl which links to a video from two high school chemistry teachers in Colorado. The two teachers describe how they modified their chemistry courses. ScienceGeekGirl gives an excellent summary of their changes and motivations, so here is the short and dirty version:

  • They realized that their traditional lecture based course was not very effective.
  • They made video podcasts of their lectures and used class time for the students to work on problems and do demos and stuff.

Really, that is it. It seems so simple, but it is very interesting. The part I find interesting is that they actually did it. I am not a high school teacher, but I am familiar enough with high schools that I know this is a difficult change to make. The cool part is that they didn't actually do away with the lecture, they just moved it to homework and moved homework to class.

Curious what would happen if more teachers did this. Would it be better for them all to make their own video lectures or would it be better for all teachers to use one set of video lectures?

One thing that was not mentioned by the two teachers in the presentation was - what about the textbook?

More like this

I just got the teaching schedule for Spring, so I decided to follow up on last week's post by putting, under the fold, a series of short posts I wrote when I taught the last time, musing about teaching in general and teaching biology to adults in particular. These are really a running commentary…
I've been pretty quiet about educational matters of late, for the simple reason that I was too busy teaching to say much. The dust having settled a bit, though, I thought I would put some notes here about what I did this past term, and what worked. I had two sections of the introductory Newtonian…
Posting has been (relatively) light this week because today was the first day of classes. I'm teaching introductory modern physics (relativity and quantum mechanics), a class that I've taught before, but I've been putting a significant amount of time into revising my lecture notes, to keep the…
Should teachers track "their class" between grades, and should students stay with their classmates between years? So, my exposure to the US K-12 educational system is increasing, and I am intrigued by some of the differences. What I don't know is whether these are broadly general across the US…

I don't teach chemistry, but in physics I usually forget to even use the textbook. I find the idea of switching lecture and HW intriguing...Do the kids really watch the podcasts? And are there kids who can't access them at home? Oh wait, I guess I should ask them, not you. Sorry.

Public education worked from 1836 (McGuffey's Eclectic Primer) through 1970 (end of IQ and other standardized testing for being Officially racially discriminatory? Waves of loathsome Irish, Italians, Asians, Eastern Europeans... were socialized and educated under the meanest of conditions without statisical White Papers, carpeted floors, air conditioned buildings, Jesse Jackson, or psychopharmacutical smorgasbords. They lived in slum hovels without Welfare, Medicaid, or social counseling - and often without heat, light, adequate calories, or indoor toilets.

What transpired in 1970 that destroyed American public education? One posits that reversing it rather than impressing more of it constitutes the empirical solution. How many US residents under the age of 20 can define "eclectic"?